Why You Should Be Vegan

Posted on August 19, 2025

Table of Contents

I may have personally sent this to you. If I have, then I'd like to start a discussion with you in good faith because I think you have an opportunity for growth here.


This is how I'd like to proceed.


The rest of this article will give my side of things, so you could represent my position if theoretically required.

This article will be in several main sections which together, build a case for veganism. Use "AI promts only" to see just the AI prompts that you can copy and paste into your favourite AI.

Whether or not you think this case is strong will be completely up to you.

We start with nutritional viability because without it, no proposed diet or lifestyle change makes sense. We then move to ethical considerations to present you with the impact our food choices make on animals and the environment.

Finally, we address the reasons people use to justify not going vegan because most non-vegans believe one or more of them.

Here are the links to each of the sections that comprise the argument:

  1. Nutritional Viability
  2. Ethical Considerations
  3. Reasons people aren't vegan

1. Nutritional Viability

Point 1: A Vegan Diet Can Be Good Enough

Is a 100% whole food plant based diet considered one of the best possible diets? Consider cancer rates, physical power, energy levels and everything else. Also consider long term what happens after 40+ years on the diet?

Up until I was about 31, I was 100% convinced that meat was essential for a healthy diet.

Since then I've changed my mind in a subtle but significant way...

One thing I'm not going to argue is that 'vegan diets are optimal'. While it may be true, I'm simply not convinced of this argument.

Likewise, I won't ever say that a vegan diet will improve your health. (there are too many unhealthy vegan foods to say this!)

I will, on the other hand, try to make the argument that a vegan diet CAN be good enough.

Any diet can be abused. You can eat vegan potato chips all day and die of obesity. A lot of candy and alcohol is vegan too. That doesn't make it healthy. But a WHOLE FOOD PLANT BASED diet is much much different and extremely healthy.

Good enough to win the olympics, good enough to live as long as any other diet, good enough to have lower rates of heart disease, diabetes and cancer. That's what I mean by good enough. I actually mean 'really fucking good' but that takes longer to make a convincing case for.

If you believe in hearing both sides before forming an opinion, I invite you to review this evidence. It's drawn exclusively from non-vegan doctors and influencers, so you can weigh their arguments and decide for yourself.

So now let's see what non-vegans doctors say about this concept....

Non-Vegan Health & Fitness Resources

Consider only non-vegan sources. Do non vegans think that a whole food plant based diet is unhealthy?

Here is the first source from Doctor Mike. One of the most popular non-vegan health channels on youtube. I present this as a source to answer: "Can the vegan diet be good enough?"

Doctor Mike on Vegan Diets
YouTube

Here is my second non-vegan health science source, this time from Renaissance Periodization. I've fast forwarded to the exact moment where he talks about his opinion on whether a vegan diet is nutritionally viable.

Renaissance Periodization on Vegan Diets
YouTube

Here is my third non-vegan source from Physionic, a well-respected evidence-based nutrition channel. This video provides another perspective on the nutritional adequacy of vegan diets.

Physionic on Vegan Diet Nutrition
YouTube

As you can see, I think basically the non-vegan science world is largely in agreement that a well-planned vegan diet can be nutritionally adequate for most people.

So when I say good enough, I actually mean that a vegan diet can indeed be a top-tier diet, good enough to win the olympics in any sport.

I won't present the following vegan sources as evidence, but I'll link to them in case you're interested. I want to build my case with only non-vegan sources since I think that's more compelling.

Vegan Health & Fitness Resources

Since these are biased vegan sources, you can ignore all these movies and move on the the next section.

Using AI only

If you're like me, nothing will convince you as much as doing your own research. So I wrote up some questions for you to put into any AI model:

Can I win the Olympics if I restrict myself to a whole food plant based diet, even in weight lifting, boxing, 100m dash etc?

Are vegans more likely to suffer from heart disease, diabetes, and cancer than non-vegans? If so, by how much?

Can vegans live as long as non-vegans?

I think this section has given you enough fair and unbiased information for you to decide for yourself if:

Point 1 Review: A Vegan Diet Can Be Good Enough

2. Ethical Considerations & Scale

I'm going to be quoting Gary Yourofsky a lot here. You can watch his full video here: Gary Yourofsky's Best Speech You Will Ever Hear. This is a long section. It's long because I have to deprogram you after years of conditioning from the meat, dairy and cheese industries.

Animals can suffer, just like us

Point 2: Animals suffer tremendously for our food choices

Besides psychological and physical abuse, torture, dismemberment and murder, what else do you think happens to animals inside of a slaughterhouse?

Do you think they get belly rubs and tushy slaps? And if you think there is such a thing as “humane slaughter”, do you also think there is such a thing as “humane” rape, “humane” child molestation, “humane” slavery?

Can cows, pigs, ducks, chickens, and other farm animals feel emotions like joy, excitement, etc. Do they have favorite friends? Do they have favorite family members? Do they have favorite foods and stuff like that?

Do all animals belong to us, for us to do whatever we please to them, regardless of any pain and suffering?

Are animals inanimate stupid objects who can't think and feel? Like a chair?

If we all understand that animals can use their eyes to see, ears to hear, noses to smell, mouths to eat, legs to walk, feathers to fly, fins to swim, genitalia to procreate, bowels to defecate, it's perplexing that most people don’t believe that they can also use their brains to think, feel, be rational, be aware and be self-aware. Are we supposed to believe that every body part of an animal functions just like it’s supposed to, except the brain, pain receptors and nerves?

Do animals like pigs or cows really suffer when we process them for food? Do they truly even have the capacity to suffer?

If you give me an open mind today, that’s all I ask for, an open mind, I’m going to take your blinders right off. My goal is simple. All I want to do is re-connect people with animals. Awaken some emotions and some feelings and some logic, that has been buried and suppressed intentionally by our society.

You have been brainwashed to accept violence

Point 3: You have been brainwashed into thinking animals don’t suffer or to ignore their suffering.

And the reason why I say “re-connect” is because each and every person reading this used to be a real animal rights person at one time, a true animal lover, and a real friend to the animal kingdom. And it’s when we were kids.

When we were kids, we used to be in awe of animals. They used to make us laugh, and giggle and smile. They made us pretty happy. And there was a time in our lives, when we would do just about anything in the world to make them happy as well....

We would have done anything to protect them from cruelty, or to, at least, acknowledge the cruelty they were receiving.

I mean, if somebody was mean to an animal in front of us when we were little, we would have screamed and cried. And that’s because we all used to understand right from wrong, when it came to the treatment of animals. Until somebody told us, and taught us differently.

You better believe that somebody told us to ignore their suffering, to mock and excuse their pain, and their misery. To make fun of their very existence.

And this is something I want you to focus on — today, tomorrow and beyond — what in the hell happened along the way?

Has the animal food industry intentionally withheld the reality of how the animals are treated from consumers, so that they can't make an informed choice? Are there any documented cases? Or is this just made up bs?

Who taught us to be so mean, nasty, vicious and hateful, or indifferent towards animals when they used to be our friends?

These are innocent beings who have done nothing wrong to us.

I'm pretty sure we can all agree on at least one thing right now; that hatred, in its purest form, is a learned behavior.

Racism, sexism, heterosexism, anti-Semitism, misogyny, these are all learned behaviors.

When kids are 2, 3, 4 years old, playing on a playground they couldn't care less about the color of their friends' skin or their religious background.

I don't think there is any doubt that hatred, in its purest form, is learned.

Speciesism is no different. This might be a new word to many people.

I want to define speciesism as the unethical, unprincipled point of view that the human species has every right to exploit, enslave and murder another species.

And all because we believe that our species is so much more special, so much more superior than the other ones — we're the only ones that count, and we're the only ones that matter.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but that line of thinking, that thought process, that is the basis of all forms of discrimination.

One group saying and thinking that they're more special than everyone else, and they proceed to exploit them, oppress them, denying them their right to be free.

They treat them like property, they enslave them in many cases, and in many other cases they murder them with premeditation, and without penalty.

I want to ask you to use some empathy right now.

And when I say 'empathy', what I'm saying is place yourself in the position of the animals, and start to view this issue from the animals' point of view, from the victims' point of view.

When you examine any form of injustice, whether humans are victims or animals are victims, please remember the victim's point of view.

If you are not the victim, don't examine it entirely from your point of view because when you're not the victim, it becomes pretty easy to rationalize and excuse cruelty, injustice, inequality, slavery, and even murder.

But when you're the victim, things look a lot differently from that angle.

And now, I want to show a graphic, 4 minute video right now, about what goes on inside of a slaughterhouse.

I want to ask you, not to turn away, not to close your eyes during this video.

It's because, if you choose to eat meat, cheese, milk and eggs, I think, at the very least, you are obligated to see the pain and suffering you are causing.

But if you do feel the need to turn away or close your eyes during this video, you might want to ask yourself a question: If it's not good enough for my eyes, then why is it good enough for my stomach?

You can watch the result of your choices here: Slaughterhouse Footage - Gary Yourofsky Speech

If you're ready to see even more truth, if you're willing to start to confront the reality of your choices, then I encourage you to watch this video too (narration partly by Joaquin Phoenix and Sia): Watch Dominion here

Did you ever wonder why McDonald's and Burger King and Wendy's never show you those images in their TV ads?

Instead they show you smiling cartoon caricatures of animals singing and dancing and playing, lying to you.

Brainwashing you, programming you, not to care about things you would normally care about, things that you used to care about.

You were brainwashed, pure and simple.

Do you think people have been actively and intentionally brainwashed (or something like it) to ignore the suffering of animals for our food choices, possibly to enrich companies that sell those products? Or is this just a conspiracy theory?

Scale of the massacre

Every year in America alone, without mercy, they murder over 50 billion land animals (as of 2025, increasing every year). Click here to see how many have been killed so far this year. Not for health, survival, sustenance or self-defense. People eat meat, cheese, milk and eggs for 4 reasons: Habit; tradition; convenience; taste.

As of writing that's almost one animal for every person in all of Canada, being killed and eaten each year.

Right now, at this very moment, on American highways, there are no less than 5,000 concentration camp trucks. Trucks that we have constructed.

Inside these trucks, there are living, terrified innocent beings: cows and pigs and chickens.

These trucks are being driven to concentration camps' slaughterhouses that we carefully constructed all across America.

When the trucks arrive, the animals are so frightened that they won't even get off the truck. They're not stupid, they know what's next.

So people go on the trucks with electric prods and force them to walk down the chutes to their own deaths.

Or if the animals are small enough to man handle, like chickens, we'll just grab them off the trucks and toss them inside.

Inside, these innocent, living beings are hanged upside down, fully conscious.

In other words, they go in alive, against their will, and come out chopped up, into hundreds of pieces.

What other massacres can rival the totality of death, dismemberment and suffering we are still causing to this day?

Yes, human suffering from slave trades, holocausts and other atrocities are unforgivable.

But the scale of what we are doing is just unimaginable.

Do you think we will look back on how we treat animals in factory farms as the most severe case of totally avoidable suffering caused by mankind in all of history? Or is this question not being fair?

But do you know what's more insane than that? Meat eaters.

Walking around like their lifestyle isn't causing any harm, like it's normal and natural to be consuming violence and death.

How would you feel, if the day that you were born, somebody else had already planned the day of your execution?

That's what it's like to be a cow, a pig, a chicken or a turkey on this planet.

I think this type of behavior is inexcusable, an unbecoming of a species that claims to understand right from wrong.

The animals have not done one single thing to us, to deserve the wrath and cruelty that we hurl on them.

And I hope you all understand what I'm offering you today.

When you leave here, after reading this, are you aware, that for the first time ever, you can now directly participate in ending a massacre.

Instead of sitting around and paying lip service to all the massacres, and all the problems that are always going on, on this planet.

Since when, does 'feeling sad' about an obvious tragedy, or 'believing in' something, make the world a better place, or make somebody a good person?

And listen, folks, I am not trying to dog you out when I talk like this, I'm not. I'm just not a politician. I'm not a bullshit artist.

I don't know how to schmooze people, as you can see. It's kind of beyond me.

I hope you appreciate my honesty and my genuineness today.

And I'm not a sales person. I've got no books to sell you after reading this. No DVDs and no documentaries. No collection plate going around, I don't want your money.

I am here to talk about the worst form of cruelty and violence taking place on this planet. Even though most people don't seem to care about it.

But when you sit back in the comfort of your living room, and you start condemning atrocities elsewhere, that is pure, unadulterated, lip service. That's the definition of "lip service."

But veganism, this is now a chance to actually walk the compassionate talk that everybody is always talking about.

This is your chance to show others how truly peaceful you are.

This is the chance for a personal revolution to leave your mark on this planet by causing the least amount of harm possible. Always being vegan.

Now come on, what's the argument for not causing the least amount of harm? Inconvenience? Indifference? Apathy? Selfishness?

I want you to know, I don't live in fantasy land. I am well aware that animals are suffering and dying just because we're here on the planet with them.

We build homes through their habitat. We pollute their environment. Destroy their habitat.

Is there a reason we have to maximize the suffering and maximize the cruelty and the death that they already endure, by eating them, on top of it all?

You want to talk about pouring salt into somebody else's wound, 98% of animals who are abused and killed on this planet are abused and killed by the meat, dairy and egg industries.

This is where all the harm to animals is taking place.

it's not just animals...

Point: Human deaths from obesity and heart disease can be significantly reduced with a whole food plant based diet.

What's the number one killer of humans who choose to eat meat, cheese, milk and egg? Heart disease from clogged arteries, atherosclerosis.

If all these people suffering from heart disease and obesity, substituted all their animal foods for whole food plant-based alternatives, what do you think would happen to the mortality numbers?

Consider all the human disease in the world. If everyone switched their animal products for whole food plant based alternatives and changed nothing else, would deaths from those diseases increase or decrease? Give rough estimates then compare those numbers in scale to other known tragedies like the plague and world wars.

If you were handed a clear and direct opportunity to help save millions of human lives, would you take it?

What, then, should we do about those who see and understand all of this, yet not only ignore the solution but continue to willingly support violence?

How to be ethical

I don't have a philosophy degree and I don't study ethics.

But I believe there is a standard that every ethical person shares.

In fact, most of our laws are built on this standard...

Even our existing animal rights laws use this amazing standard.

Ethical Standard: If you cause suffering to another being, you must have a very good reason for doing so.


The greater the suffering you cause, the greater the justification needed.

Is it true that every ethical person must have this standard: If you cause suffering to another being, you must have a very good reason for doing so. The greater the suffering you cause, the greater the justification needed?

The global treatment of animals is a horrific industry of violence and slavery against our animal brothers and sisters.

Is this not close to, or perhaps even, the most extreme form and scale of suffering in human history? Click here to see how many have been killed so far this year

And what then is our equally great justification? Taste, convenience, and tradition, habit?

Pathetic. Inexcusable. Evil.

Introduction to Veganism
YouTube

If you want a more philosophical approach, please see this video:

Philosophical Approach to Veganism
YouTube

3. Reasons people aren't vegan

There are a few reasons why people aren't vegan, then another 100 reasons people use to justify continued violence against our defenseless animal brothers and sisters.

The main ones are:

1. Unaware of the ethical gap between animal foods and vegan foods

2. Convenience

3. Taste preferences

4. Tradition

5. Habit

Then we have what we in the vegan community call mental gymnastics...

Here's an example: "I love my dog, but I eat cows because they're not pets."

I'm Christian and the Bible clearly says I can eat animals

Based on bible verses alone, do they tell us that animals can suffer? And do they tell us that animals should be well taken care of? Give examples. Finally, does God want us to take care of animals? Again based only on the bible.

Context on Biblical Dietary Laws

The Bible presents a clear progression on the ethics of eating meat, which forms the basis for the traditional Christian understanding that it is morally acceptable. This progression begins in the Garden of Eden with an initial plant-based diet (Genesis 1:29).

A significant shift occurs after the flood when God gives Noah and his family direct permission to eat animals for the first time (Genesis 9:3). Later, for the nation of Israel, God provides specific regulations under the Mosaic Law, distinguishing between clean and unclean animals, thereby codifying the practice of meat consumption (Deuteronomy 14:3-6).

The New Testament offers a broader affirmation of this freedom, as seen in Jesus's own action of eating fish after his resurrection (Luke 24:41-43) and in Peter's pivotal vision where God declares all foods "clean" (Acts 10:13-15).

The Apostle Paul solidifies this view, teaching that Christians can eat anything sold in the market (1 Corinthians 10:25) and that "everything God created is good," to be received with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:4-5).

This being true I think there is enough biblical evidence to suggest that eating meat is permissible.

From here I will make two points. The first is that even if the Bible condones eating meat, there is still a great unpassable ethical road to travel to arrive at how we treat animals in a factory farm. I will call this point 'Can we justify a factory farm?'

The second is that the bible has been used to justify practices that in today's world are not only unethical, but totally illegal. I'll call this point 'being cautious about using the bible to justify things'.

Can we justify a factory farm?

Is what happens in a factory farm Christlike? If Jesus came and saw what was happening, do you think he would support it or oppose it?

Jesus identifies Himself as the "Good Shepherd" in John 10:11, saying, "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down His life for the sheep" . This declaration highlights the sacrificial nature of Christ's mission and His deep love and commitment to His followers; by comparing himself to a protector of animals ( Bible Hub: The Role of the Shepherd ).

What is more Christlike than the sheperd laying down his life for even one of his sheep?

The role of the shepherd is further expanded in the parable of the lost sheep, where Jesus illustrates God's relentless pursuit of the lost: "What man among you, if he has a hundred sheep and loses one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the pasture and go after the one that is lost, until he finds it?" (Luke 15:4). This demonstrates the divine care that extends to every individual creature ( Bible Hub: The Role of the Shepherd ).

This care is further evident in the way God commands kindness towards animals in various passages, such as Proverbs 12:10, which states, "A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal" ( Bible Hub: Proverbs 12:10 ).

It's very hard to read these passages and arrive at the conclusion that animals are inanimate unfeeling commodities to be bought, sold, and killed without limit or consideration.

Based on the Bible alone, are animals inanimate unfeeling commodities? can we buy, sell, and kill them without consideration? Give sources from the Bible.

So yes, the bible does condone the use of animals for food, but nowhere does it mandate it, and it also describes a deep love and care for animals.

We also know Jesus was a carpenter.

But it is an Olympic leap to conclude that Jesus condones modern forestry industry.

Jesus was a carpenter. Does this mean Jesus condones modern forestry industry practices?

I'm not trying to say that Jesus would be against all forms of tree cutting, but rather that we need to be cautious about extending this logic to include any and all forms of tree cutting, regardless of the environmental impact.

Jesus ate fish and meat. Does this mean Jesus condones modern animal farming industry practices?

Being cautious about using the bible to justify things

Even in the past 100 years, the Bible has been used to justify various forms of oppression and violence. This historical context is crucial when interpreting scripture.

In the past, was the bible used to justify things like slavery, sexism, racism and homophobia? Are there direct bible verses that were used to support these things? If so, can you give examples?

We have to be careful not to cherry-pick Bible verses to justify our own agendas, as has historically been the case.

Wrapping Up

Would Jesus or any of the Apostles choose to eat animals if there are abundant plant foods available? Then, extend this question to all characters in the bible that are historically considered righteous. Would any of them choose to eat animals if there are plant based vegan foods readily available?

Are you using your religion to justify more violence and cruelty than is absolutely necessary?

instead...

When it comes to our food sources: Do you think Jesus would want us to use the bible to justify more compassion towards animals, or to justify continued violence against them? Or is this question unfair?

Shouldn't your religion be used to justify compassion, even when it's inconvenient?

Which is more likely: modern factory farming is the devil's work or that modern factory farming is the Lord's work?

Christian Perspective on Veganism
YouTube

There are bigger and more important issues in the world

This logic is absolutely not how doing the right thing works, and it's a misunderstanding of how serious of a crime it is to needlessly kill and dismember animals.

We aren't allowed to justify doing something wrong because someone somewhere is doing something worse.

Also, dismembering an animal needlessly is a very serious offense.

People who use this argument are still under the assumption that animals can't really suffer.

No one would make this argument if we were talking about dismembering dogs, for instance. No one would try and defend the person dismembering a dog by saying 'we can justify this because there are children starving in Africa and Donald Trump is starting world war 3!'

Can I justify doing something wrong by noticing that there are bigger issues in the world? Does that make sense?

Still Not Convinced?

I did my best here to provide an unbiased view of why I think you should be vegan, but I may have—and often do—miss important facts. I admit I could be wrong in my thinking.

If you're not convinced, would you honour me by telling me where I've erred in my thinking? Would you tell me why you're not convinced? And will you tell me why you won't go vegan?

I'm genuinely interested in hearing your perspective and learning from it.